Social Constructivism

Social construction of technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Sociology
Portal · History
General Aspects
Public sociology · Social researchSocial theory · Sociological theorySociological practice
Related fields & subfields
Comparative sociology · CriminologyDemography · Social movementsSocial psychology · SociolinguisticsSociology of: culture · devianceeconomics · education · genderknowledge · law · politics · religionscience · stratification · work
Categories & Lists
Journals · Publications · Topics
This box: view • talk • edit

This article or section includes a list of references or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks in-text citations.You can improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate.
Social construction of technology (also referred to as SCOT) is a theory within the field of Science and Technology Studies (or Technology and society). Advocates of SCOT -- that is, social constructivists -- argue that technology does not determine human action, but that rather, human action shapes technology. They also argue that the ways in which a technology is used cannot be understood without understanding how that technology is embedded in its social context. SCOT is a response to technological determinism and is sometimes known as technological constructivism.
SCOT draws on work done in the constructivist school of the sociology of scientific knowledge, and its subtopics include actor-network theory (a branch of the sociology of science and technology) and historical analysis of sociotechnical systems Thomas P. Hughes. Leading adherents of SCOT include Wiebe Bijker and Trevor Pinch.
SCOT holds that those who seek to understand the reasons for acceptance or rejection of a technology should look to the social world. It is not enough, according to SCOT, to explain a technology's success by saying that it is "the best" -- researchers must look at how the criteria of being "the best" is defined and what groups and stakeholders participate in defining it. In particular, they must ask who defines the technical criteria by which success is measured, why technical criteria are defined in this way, and who is included or excluded.
SCOT is not only a theory, but also a methodology: it formalizes the steps and principles to follow when one wants to analyze the causes of technological failures or successes.